A studio service
Energy pitch deck design where the contract is the asset.
An energy investor is not buying megawatts. They are buying a contracted revenue stream with a yield assessment behind it, an interconnection position in front of it, and a stage gate that this round is supposed to reach. We design decks that answer those in the order an underwriter asks them.
Investment
Three ways to raise.
Fixed price, fixed scope. Pick the tier that matches your raise — from a single deal deck to a full capital-raise kit.
Essential
A sharp investor deck at the length most decks should be — you bring the content, we design it.
5–7 business days
- 12–15 designed slides
- Core investor structure (problem → ask)
- Your brand applied throughout
- Custom charts (market, traction)
- 1 revision round
- Editable PowerPoint source files
Standard
The full raise: we shape the narrative from your inputs at the length investors actually read.
Priority · 4–5 business days
- 15–20 designed slides
- We build the narrative from your inputs
- Full custom chart set
- Matching 1-page investor teaser
- 2 revision rounds
- Editable PowerPoint + source
Complete
A comprehensive deck for detailed raises and sales — full appendix, plus a condensed sales version.
Rush available
- 25–40 slides — deck + appendix
- Custom graphics & data-room slides
- Condensed sales version of the deck
- 3 revision rounds, white-glove
- 30-minute strategy call
- All source files
N° 01What energy decks get wrong
Four ways a project deck loses the room.
01
Nameplate capacity as the headline
The product is not installed MW, it is MWh delivered at a price, at a settlement point, under a contract. A capacity figure with a single capacity factor and no exceedance probability tells a technical reader that nobody technical has been near the deck.
02
A yield number with no P-value
An energy investor reads an unlabelled yield as a P50 until proven otherwise. What earns trust is stating the exceedance case, the measurement campaign behind it, the long-term reference correction and the loss-and-uncertainty stack that produced the spread.
03
LCOE used as the money slide
LCOE compares build costs; it is not revenue. Quoting it as the investment case is the clearest tell of an outsider deck. What belongs beside it is the contracted price, the capture rate on any uncontracted volume, and the basis between hub and node.
04
A company raise and a project raise fused together
A platform raise is about origination, pipeline conversion by stage and value created per MW between gates. A single-asset raise is about one set of contracts and one cash-flow profile, and needs almost no market sizing. Decks that do both serve neither.
N° 02What we design
The slides an underwriter looks for.
01
The offtake slide
Instrument, tenor, contracted share of output, counterparty and credit support — and the settlement point, because a contract settled at a hub while the project sells at its node leaves basis risk with the sponsor.
02
The interconnection slide
Which cluster, which study phase, the assigned upgrade cost, the deposit at risk and the withdrawal exposure. A queue position with an unquantified upgrade cost is discounted to near zero, so the honest version is worth more than the vague one.
03
The stage-gate and use-of-funds map
Named gates rather than months of runway: site control, permit filing, interconnection milestones, EPC award, notice to proceed, energisation, commercial operation. Development spend and capex read as separate lines because they carry different risk.
04
Storage read properly
Energy and duration alongside power, the warranted retention curve and its measurement conditions, round-trip efficiency with its boundary stated, and an augmentation plan with a reserved line — then the revenue stack split into contracted and merchant.
Sample slides
Sample slides, in house style.
Generated in our editorial discipline — framed to your vertical. Every deck we ship is original and bespoke.
Questions
The answers we give most often.
- Do you design project decks or company decks?
- Both, but not as one file. A single-asset raise argues one set of contracts and one cash-flow profile; a platform raise argues origination and repeatability. We build whichever you are actually raising, and the other as a separate document if you need both.
- How technical should the deck be?
- Technical enough to be quotable. Yield with its exceedance case, offtake with its settlement point, interconnection with its study phase. Detail beyond that belongs in an appendix and a data room, not in the main flow.
- Can you design the pipeline table?
- Yes, and it needs stage columns rather than one aggregate figure. Early, mid, late and construction-ready are different assets with different values, and collapsing them into a single number is read as concealment.
- We do not have an offtake yet. Is that fatal?
- No, but it changes the argument. Without contracted revenue the deck has to carry a credible merchant case — capture rate rather than a flat forward curve — and be explicit that this is the risk the round is funding.
- Do you work with our technical advisers?
- Yes. We design from your yield assessment and independent engineer's report rather than around them, and we will not restate a number more precisely than the underlying study supports.
- What about storage and hybrid projects?
- Same discipline, more variables. Duration, retention and augmentation belong on the page, and the revenue stack has to separate what is contracted from what depends on merchant spreads.
Next step
Raising for a project or a platform?
Tell us which one, what stage it is at, and what is contracted. We'll come back with the structure we'd build and what the deck still needs from you.